Litigation Finance in New Jersey
New Jersey courts have stated unequivocally that the state’s law has never recognized the doctrine of champerty. Indeed, those courts
Read moreNew Jersey courts have stated unequivocally that the state’s law has never recognized the doctrine of champerty. Indeed, those courts
Read moreNew Hampshire courts have long disregarded the doctrine of champerty, opening the door for litigation finance agreements. Although New Hampshire
Read moreAn Australian company has developed a new model for litigation financing that could be especially attractive to small and medium-sized
Read moreAll over the world, litigation finance is growing rapidly, and such growth brings increasing sophistication. For many years, funders typically
Read moreFull disclosure is an important part of making any transaction work. This applies to litigation funding transactions to the same
Read moreOf course, attorneys must always be sensitive to their ethical obligations, especially their ethical obligations to their clients. But those
Read moreOne of the most fundamental ethical rules governing law practice is that a lawyer may not share legal fees with
Read moreLitigation financing provides extraordinary opportunities for litigants to reduce the risk of litigation and increase their chances of obtaining a
Read moreAs noted in a previous post, when litigants and their lawyers communicate with litigation funders, they must be careful not
Read moreWhen litigants are communicating with litigation funders, they must provide information about their case. This communication creates a possibility of
Read more